Russia and Mustachioed Men
Saturday, 20 May 2017
Stalin and power
Introduction
·
Stalin and Bukharin dominant, Bukharin still had
significant support
·
1953 Stalin sole leader
·
Policies helped eliminate rivals but other
factors important later
Ban on factions
·
Bukharin scared of being accused of factionalism
so didn’t argue grain 1928
·
Stalin published disagreements
·
Stalin got Zinoviev and Kamenev to accuse
Bukharin of factionalism (or the other way round???)
·
November 1929 expelled from the party
NEP
·
Capitalist economy elements. NEP men unpopular
so Stain used it to discredit Bukharin
·
NEP not industrialise fast enough
·
Once Trotsky gone take charge of left
·
Used to bring in Five Year Plan
·
Also linked to faction ban Bukharin scared to
speak out
Stalin
·
1941 Stalin chair of Sovnarkom
·
After war – divide and rule
Terror
·
Murder of Kirov – start most terror / purges
·
Show trials eliminated rivals
·
Lower level of party purges
·
Suspended during war
·
Restarted after war
·
Leningrad 1949
·
Mingrelian Affair 1951
·
Doctors plot 1953
·
Links to ban on factions? – had excuse to remove
opposition
Second World War
·
Terror reduced
·
Stalin ‘war hero’
·
Propaganda
·
1941 Sovnarkom
·
Need for efficiency
·
State defense committee set up
·
All secured position
Conclusion
·
1921 increase domination, eliminate opposition
and ideological orthodoxy
·
Use of terror crucial to maintain power
Was Stalin’s power total?
·
Stalin couldn’t know everything – he had to
prioritise
·
Politburo didn’t just agree still some debate
e.g. Ryutin was sent to10 years labour rather than execution after he denounced
Stalin
Relationship between the Party and the State
·
The relationship was vague and never defined –
Stalin used this to his advantage
·
Stalin was essentially in power from 1928 but he
only became the chair f the Sovnarkom. The government was largely inneficiant
in the 1930’s but war meant there was a need for strong, organised government.
In order to better coordinate the two Stalin took leading positions in both the
State and the Party
·
Mass terror was ended, Stalin allowed the State
to gain power and he created the State Defense Committee (GKO) that was
responcible for defense, military production and overseeing the economy
·
What Lenin had called commissars became
ministers and the Politburo became the Council of Ministers and later the
Presidium
Tuesday, 16 May 2017
Khrushchev's failures and achievements
Khrushchev's failures
- Failed economy
- Height of Cold War - Cuban missile crisis, Berlin wall
- Khrushchev repeatedly backed down
Never publicly rejected or criticised Stalin
- Secret speech remained secret
Achievements
Ending of mass terror
- Sacked not murdered
More spread out/ democratic
- E.g. secret speech revised by central committee beforehand
Democratisation of the Party
Khrushchev
Reaction to problems
- Retreat
- Questions of history disciplined for publishing details about terror
- December 1957 - special commission set up and headed by Brezhnev to suppress anti-communism
- New Year's Eve 1957 - speech in which Khrushchev said that "all communists are Stalinists"
Anti-Party group
- June 1957 - Presidium voted to replace Khrushchev but only Central Committee could replace him and he had majority there so he survived
- Opponents sacked
- March 1958 - Khrushchev became Prime Minister
What does it show?
- Not willing to use terror
- Needed central committee to survive
Khrushchev's fall
- Plot in the presidium - accused of creating a dangerous foreign policy and failed economic policy
- Supported by the Central committee
- Khrushchev "retired due to ill health" - given a pension, guards, a luxury car
Problems with De-Stalinisation
Going too far
- Had to be careful not to alienate loyal Stalinists
- Delegates had heart attacks during speech
- People committing suicide after
Not far enough
- Hungary 1956 - rebellion crushed using Soviet troops
- Student demonstrations for multiparty democracy at Moscow State University in 1957 were crushed
Khrushchev's aims
Goals
- End Mass terror
- Continue Lenin's mission
- Rebuild the Party
Methods
- De-Stalinisation
- Democratisation and decentralisation
- Party reforms
Outcomes
- Instability
How far did Khrushchev's Government differ from Stalin's?
Problems in 1953
- Stalin died - leaderless
- Cold War - tensions between USSR and USA
- Poor living conditions
- Shortages of consumer goods e.g. shoes
- People trying to leave
- Housing shortages
- Basic food not much variety
- Reduced population after war
How did he take power?
The contenders for power were
- Georgy Malenkov - he was said to be Stalin's choice of successor. After his death he became Premier of the Soviet Union, the leader of the Soviet Government
- Lavrentiy Beria - leader of Stalin's political police
- Nikita Khrushchev - he was a well liked member of the Politburo and on Stalin's death was appointed Secretary of the Central Committee
The Beria reforms set out to give more power to the Party and the State by restricting the power of the MVD
Beria's rivals were worried that he might use the MVD against them. So in June 1953 at a meeting of the Presidium Beria was arrested and executed. A plot organised by Malenkov and Khrushchev
From mid-1953 to the end of 1954 Khrushchev and Malenkov ruled as a dummvirate. Although they were working together there was still a struggle for power between them.
Khrushchev used his position as Secretary of the general committee to introduce his supporters in the place of Stalinist Senior officials. Between 1953 and 1956 half of the regional Party secretaries had been replaced by Khrushchev and 44% of the Central committee
Next Khrushchev set out to weaken the State as it was Malenkov's power base.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
